Specific features of EU external relations law
36 22
Кілттік сөздер:
EU law, external competence, CFSP, international agreements,Аннотация
The issue discussed in this article is the EU law in its external relationsafter the entry into force of the Treaty of Lisbon. In the law of EU in external actions there are some special features and exceptions which are found only after comparing the provisions of TEU and TFEU, and analyzing the practice of exercising EU its competences. Although the Lisbon Treaty recently expanded the scope of external exclusive EU competence, there are some exceptional moments, as in transport policy which is outside the scope of the CCP and the external competence is shared between the EU and the Member States or the Development policy which is exercised under shared competence, albeit with the caveat that the exercise of EU competence in relation to development cooperation and humanitarian aid does not pre-empt the Member States from exercising their competence. The broad scope of CFSP gives rise to the question about a borderline between the CFSP and other external policies of the EU. The title of conclusion of international agreements also has exceptional moment in area of mixed agreements which is made on the basis of the EU and Member State’s joint participation.Библиографиялық сілтемелер
1 Paul J. C. EU External relations law and policy in the post-Lisbon era, Hague: Springer. – 2012. – P.37.
2 Bazerkoska J. B. The legal personality of the EU // Iustinianus Primus Law Review. – 2011. – Vol. 2:1. – P. 9.
3 Craig P., Burca G. EU Law: Text, Cases, and Materials. 5th edn., New York: Oxford University Press. – 2011. – P. 311.
4 Waele H. Legal dynamics of EU External relations, Berlin: Springer. – 2011. – P.11
5 Opinion 1/94 // <http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?qid=1403962991964&uri=CELEX:61994CV0001
6 Craig P., de Búrca G. EU Law: Text, Cases, and Materials. 5th edn., New York: Oxford University Press. – 2011. – P. 320.
7 See: Shan W., Zhang Sh. The Treaty of Lisbon: Half Way toward a Common Investment Policy // European Journal of International
Law. – 2011. – Vol. 21, No. 4. – P.1049–1073.
8 Eeckhout P. EU External Relations Law, UK: Oxford University Press. – 2012. – P.125.
9 Paul Craig. The Lisbon treaty. Law, politics and treaty reform, UK: Oxford University Press. – 2010. – P. 393.
10 Eeckhout P. EU External Relations Law, UK: Oxford University Press. – 2012. – P.171.
11 Case C – 91/05. Commission v. Council (ECOWAS). [2008]. para. 31, 33 // <http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT
/?qid=1403962106303&uri=CELEX:62005CJ0091
12 Craig P., Burca G. EU Law: Text, Cases, and Materials. 5th edn., New York: Oxford University Press. – 2011. – P. 330.
13 Paul Craig. The Lisbon treaty. Law, politics and treaty reform, UK: Oxford University Press. – 2010. – P. 415.
14 Eeckhout P. EU External Relations Law, UK: Oxford University Press. – 2012. – P. 123.
15 Craig P., Burca G. EU Law: Text, Cases, and Materials. 5th edn., New York: Oxford University Press. – 2011. – P. 335.
16 See: Martines F. Direct effect of international agreements of the European Union // European Journal of International Law. –2014. – Vol. 25. No. 1. – P. 129–147.
2 Bazerkoska J. B. The legal personality of the EU // Iustinianus Primus Law Review. – 2011. – Vol. 2:1. – P. 9.
3 Craig P., Burca G. EU Law: Text, Cases, and Materials. 5th edn., New York: Oxford University Press. – 2011. – P. 311.
4 Waele H. Legal dynamics of EU External relations, Berlin: Springer. – 2011. – P.11
5 Opinion 1/94 // <http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?qid=1403962991964&uri=CELEX:61994CV0001
6 Craig P., de Búrca G. EU Law: Text, Cases, and Materials. 5th edn., New York: Oxford University Press. – 2011. – P. 320.
7 See: Shan W., Zhang Sh. The Treaty of Lisbon: Half Way toward a Common Investment Policy // European Journal of International
Law. – 2011. – Vol. 21, No. 4. – P.1049–1073.
8 Eeckhout P. EU External Relations Law, UK: Oxford University Press. – 2012. – P.125.
9 Paul Craig. The Lisbon treaty. Law, politics and treaty reform, UK: Oxford University Press. – 2010. – P. 393.
10 Eeckhout P. EU External Relations Law, UK: Oxford University Press. – 2012. – P.171.
11 Case C – 91/05. Commission v. Council (ECOWAS). [2008]. para. 31, 33 // <http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT
/?qid=1403962106303&uri=CELEX:62005CJ0091
12 Craig P., Burca G. EU Law: Text, Cases, and Materials. 5th edn., New York: Oxford University Press. – 2011. – P. 330.
13 Paul Craig. The Lisbon treaty. Law, politics and treaty reform, UK: Oxford University Press. – 2010. – P. 415.
14 Eeckhout P. EU External Relations Law, UK: Oxford University Press. – 2012. – P. 123.
15 Craig P., Burca G. EU Law: Text, Cases, and Materials. 5th edn., New York: Oxford University Press. – 2011. – P. 335.
16 See: Martines F. Direct effect of international agreements of the European Union // European Journal of International Law. –2014. – Vol. 25. No. 1. – P. 129–147.
Жүктелулер
Шығарылым
Бөлім
Сыртқы саясат пен халықаралық қатынастардың қазіргі мәселелері
