Правовой режим Арктики – новые вызовы и новые измерения
84 50
Кілттік сөздер:
Арктика, Конвенции ООН по морскому праву с 1982 года, Комиссия по вопросам границ, исключительная экономическая зона, континентальный шельфАннотация
Международный правовой режим Арктики в отношении специфики ледяного покрова основывается в первую очередь на Конвенции ООН по морскому праву с 1982 года. В настоящее время отсутству- ет военный конфликт за овладение территорией, демаркацию границ или за морское дно. Однако это не исключает возможность возникновения потенциального конфликта в близкой или далекой перспективе. Целью статьи является анализ правовoгo режимa Арктики, континентального шельфа, отдельных споров об установлении границы между прибрежными водами, суверенными экономиче- скими зонами, континентальными шельфами и о праве на территориальный суверенитет над сушей Арктики.Библиографиялық сілтемелер
1 Travnichkova Z., P. Cibulkova, Gavlova R. B. Knotkova V. Arkticheskaya politika Evropeiskogo Soyuza
v mezhdunarodnom kontexte //Sovremennaya Europa. – 2010. N 1. – P.28. <Access online> http://ces.vse.cz/wp-content/travnickova-arktida.pdf [cit 9.9.2011].
2 Timitchenko L. The Russian Arctic Sectoral Concept: Past And Present, 1996. <Access online> http://pubs.aina.ucalgary.ca/arctic/Arctic50-1-29.pdf. [cit 2.10.2011]3 Bird K. Circum-Arctic Resource Appraisal: Estimates of Undiscovered Oil and Gas North of the Arctic
Circle, 2008. <Access online>:http://pubs.usgs.gov/fs/2008/3049/fs2008-3049.pdf.
4 Blank S. Russia in the arctic. – US Army war college, Carlisle: Strategic Studies Institute, 2011. 153 p.
<Access online>:http://www.strategicstudiesinstitute.army.mil/pubs/display.cfm?pubid=1073.
5 Hossain K. 2009. International governance in Arctic // Yearbook of polar law, Vol. 2. -Leiden: Martinus
Nijhoff, 2009. – P. 139–169.
6 Byers, Michael. 2010. Who Owns the Arctic? Understanding Soveregnty Disputes in the North. – Vancouver/Toronto/Berkeley:
Douglas McIntyre, 2010. – 192 p.
7 Potochniy M., Ondrey J. Mezhdunarodnoe public law. – Prague: C. H. Beck, 2011. – 511 p.
8 Поточны M., Oндрей Й. Meждународное публичное право. – Прага: C. H. Beck, 2011. – 511 p.
9 Hellman J. Racing for the arctic? Better bring a fl ag. <Access online>: http://cojcr.org/vol10no2/627-656.
pdf [cit 26.10.2011]
10 Huebert R. The Newly Emerging Arctic Security Environment, 2010. <Access online>: http://www.
cdfai.org/PDF/The%20Newly%20Emerging%20Arctic%20Security%20Environment.pdf. [cit 22.10.2011].
11 Battle for the Arctic heats up // CBC News Canada, 2009. [цит. 20.10.2011] <Access online>: http://www.cbc.ca/news/background/cdnmilitary/arctic.html.
12 Beck P. The international politics of Antarctica. – Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan, 1987. 332 p.
13 Bosnan I. Cooperation or Confl ict in a Changing Arctic? // Ocean Development & International law. –2011, vol. 42. – P. 173–210.
14 Brubaker D. Governing Arctic Shipping: Finding a Role for the Arctic council // Yearbook of polar law,Vol. 2. Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff, 2009. – P. 9–114.
15 Connley H. U. S. Strategic Interests in the Arctic: An Assessment of Current Challenges and New Opportunities
for Cooperation. [cit 25.10.2011] <Access online>: http://csis.org/fi les/publication/100426_Conley_USStrategicInterests_Web.pdf.
16 Daniel T. Sir Arthur Watts: Foreign Offi ce legal adviser who became a sought-after international lawyer, 2008. [cit 23.10.2011]. <Access online> http://www.indepdendent.co.uk/news/obituaries/sir-arthur-wattsforeign-offi
ce-legal-adviser-who-became-a-soughtafter-international-lawyer-762836.html.
17 David V. Mezhdunarodnoye publichnoe pravo s kazuistikou. – Praga: «Leges», 2011. – 448 p.
18 Frankovska J. Atlas methods of ecological restoration time. – Bratislava: D. Stuhr State Institute of Geology, 2010.- 360 p.
19 Grimsson O. 2009. Opening adress at the second Akureyri Polar Law symposium // Yearbook of polar law. – Vol. 2. – Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff, 2009. – P. 1–6.
20 Karey G. Antarctica not a role model as fi ve Arctic nations call the shots and vie for resources, 2009.
[cit 18.10.2011]. <Access online>: http://www.platts.com/weblog/oilblog/2009/04/10/antarctica_not_a_role_model_as_five_arctic_nations_call_the_shots_and_vie_for_resources.html
21 Keil K. The EU in the Arctic “Game” – The Concert of Arctic Actors and the EU’s Newcomer Role,
2010. [cit 6.10.2011]. <Access online> http://www.ecprnet.eu/databases/conferences/papers/209.pdf.
22 Kleist M. Greenland’s self-government // Polar law Textbook. – 2010. Vol. 2. – Copenhagen: Nordic council of ministers. – P. 172–198.
23 Koivurona T. The Arctic – Navigational issues under international law of the sea // Yearbook of polar law. – Vol. 2, Leiden: Martinus, 2009.- P. 115–138.
24 Malenovski J. International Public Law. – Brno: Masaryk University, 2008. – 551 p.
25 Moore N. Cold conspirators: Ice crystals implicated in Arctic pollution, 2008. <Access online>: http://
ns.umich.edu/new/releases/6360-Cold%20conspirators%20Ice%20crystals%20implicated%20in%20Arctic%20pollution.
26 Mraz C. International Public Law. – Banska Bystrica: M. Bela University. – 564 p.
27 Nowlan L. Arctic Legal Regime for Environmental Protection. [cit 28.9.2011]. <Access online> : http://weavingaweb.org/pdfdocuments/EPLP44EN.pdf.
28 O’Roubke R. Changes in the Arctic: Background and Issues for Congress. [cit 25.10.2011]. <Access online> http://www.nsf.gov/od/opp/opp_advisory/briefi ngs/may2009/nspd66_hspd25.pdf.
29 Russian Navy resumes military presence near Spitsbergen. [cit 8.10.2011] <Access online>: http://en.rian.ru/world/20080714/113914174.html.
30 Snow, water, ice and permafrost in the arctic. Arctic Monitoring and assessment programme <Access online> : http://amap.no/swipa/SWIPA2011ExecutiveSummaryV2.pdf. [cit 20.10.2011].
31 Trigs G. The Antarctic Treaty System: A Model of Legal Creativity and Cooperation // Science Diplomacy.
University of Sydney, 2006 [cit 25.10.2011] <Access online>: http://www.atsummit50.aq/media/book-8.pdf.
32 U.S. Leaders Support Law of the Sea Treaty. 2010, [cit 22.9.2011] <Access online> Доступ в Интернете:http://www.worldwatch.org/node/5993.
v mezhdunarodnom kontexte //Sovremennaya Europa. – 2010. N 1. – P.28. <Access online> http://ces.vse.cz/wp-content/travnickova-arktida.pdf [cit 9.9.2011].
2 Timitchenko L. The Russian Arctic Sectoral Concept: Past And Present, 1996. <Access online> http://pubs.aina.ucalgary.ca/arctic/Arctic50-1-29.pdf. [cit 2.10.2011]3 Bird K. Circum-Arctic Resource Appraisal: Estimates of Undiscovered Oil and Gas North of the Arctic
Circle, 2008. <Access online>:http://pubs.usgs.gov/fs/2008/3049/fs2008-3049.pdf.
4 Blank S. Russia in the arctic. – US Army war college, Carlisle: Strategic Studies Institute, 2011. 153 p.
<Access online>:http://www.strategicstudiesinstitute.army.mil/pubs/display.cfm?pubid=1073.
5 Hossain K. 2009. International governance in Arctic // Yearbook of polar law, Vol. 2. -Leiden: Martinus
Nijhoff, 2009. – P. 139–169.
6 Byers, Michael. 2010. Who Owns the Arctic? Understanding Soveregnty Disputes in the North. – Vancouver/Toronto/Berkeley:
Douglas McIntyre, 2010. – 192 p.
7 Potochniy M., Ondrey J. Mezhdunarodnoe public law. – Prague: C. H. Beck, 2011. – 511 p.
8 Поточны M., Oндрей Й. Meждународное публичное право. – Прага: C. H. Beck, 2011. – 511 p.
9 Hellman J. Racing for the arctic? Better bring a fl ag. <Access online>: http://cojcr.org/vol10no2/627-656.
pdf [cit 26.10.2011]
10 Huebert R. The Newly Emerging Arctic Security Environment, 2010. <Access online>: http://www.
cdfai.org/PDF/The%20Newly%20Emerging%20Arctic%20Security%20Environment.pdf. [cit 22.10.2011].
11 Battle for the Arctic heats up // CBC News Canada, 2009. [цит. 20.10.2011] <Access online>: http://www.cbc.ca/news/background/cdnmilitary/arctic.html.
12 Beck P. The international politics of Antarctica. – Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan, 1987. 332 p.
13 Bosnan I. Cooperation or Confl ict in a Changing Arctic? // Ocean Development & International law. –2011, vol. 42. – P. 173–210.
14 Brubaker D. Governing Arctic Shipping: Finding a Role for the Arctic council // Yearbook of polar law,Vol. 2. Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff, 2009. – P. 9–114.
15 Connley H. U. S. Strategic Interests in the Arctic: An Assessment of Current Challenges and New Opportunities
for Cooperation. [cit 25.10.2011] <Access online>: http://csis.org/fi les/publication/100426_Conley_USStrategicInterests_Web.pdf.
16 Daniel T. Sir Arthur Watts: Foreign Offi ce legal adviser who became a sought-after international lawyer, 2008. [cit 23.10.2011]. <Access online> http://www.indepdendent.co.uk/news/obituaries/sir-arthur-wattsforeign-offi
ce-legal-adviser-who-became-a-soughtafter-international-lawyer-762836.html.
17 David V. Mezhdunarodnoye publichnoe pravo s kazuistikou. – Praga: «Leges», 2011. – 448 p.
18 Frankovska J. Atlas methods of ecological restoration time. – Bratislava: D. Stuhr State Institute of Geology, 2010.- 360 p.
19 Grimsson O. 2009. Opening adress at the second Akureyri Polar Law symposium // Yearbook of polar law. – Vol. 2. – Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff, 2009. – P. 1–6.
20 Karey G. Antarctica not a role model as fi ve Arctic nations call the shots and vie for resources, 2009.
[cit 18.10.2011]. <Access online>: http://www.platts.com/weblog/oilblog/2009/04/10/antarctica_not_a_role_model_as_five_arctic_nations_call_the_shots_and_vie_for_resources.html
21 Keil K. The EU in the Arctic “Game” – The Concert of Arctic Actors and the EU’s Newcomer Role,
2010. [cit 6.10.2011]. <Access online> http://www.ecprnet.eu/databases/conferences/papers/209.pdf.
22 Kleist M. Greenland’s self-government // Polar law Textbook. – 2010. Vol. 2. – Copenhagen: Nordic council of ministers. – P. 172–198.
23 Koivurona T. The Arctic – Navigational issues under international law of the sea // Yearbook of polar law. – Vol. 2, Leiden: Martinus, 2009.- P. 115–138.
24 Malenovski J. International Public Law. – Brno: Masaryk University, 2008. – 551 p.
25 Moore N. Cold conspirators: Ice crystals implicated in Arctic pollution, 2008. <Access online>: http://
ns.umich.edu/new/releases/6360-Cold%20conspirators%20Ice%20crystals%20implicated%20in%20Arctic%20pollution.
26 Mraz C. International Public Law. – Banska Bystrica: M. Bela University. – 564 p.
27 Nowlan L. Arctic Legal Regime for Environmental Protection. [cit 28.9.2011]. <Access online> : http://weavingaweb.org/pdfdocuments/EPLP44EN.pdf.
28 O’Roubke R. Changes in the Arctic: Background and Issues for Congress. [cit 25.10.2011]. <Access online> http://www.nsf.gov/od/opp/opp_advisory/briefi ngs/may2009/nspd66_hspd25.pdf.
29 Russian Navy resumes military presence near Spitsbergen. [cit 8.10.2011] <Access online>: http://en.rian.ru/world/20080714/113914174.html.
30 Snow, water, ice and permafrost in the arctic. Arctic Monitoring and assessment programme <Access online> : http://amap.no/swipa/SWIPA2011ExecutiveSummaryV2.pdf. [cit 20.10.2011].
31 Trigs G. The Antarctic Treaty System: A Model of Legal Creativity and Cooperation // Science Diplomacy.
University of Sydney, 2006 [cit 25.10.2011] <Access online>: http://www.atsummit50.aq/media/book-8.pdf.
32 U.S. Leaders Support Law of the Sea Treaty. 2010, [cit 22.9.2011] <Access online> Доступ в Интернете:http://www.worldwatch.org/node/5993.
Жүктелулер
Как цитировать
Mraz, S. (2016). Правовой режим Арктики – новые вызовы и новые измерения. Халықаралық қатынастар және халықаралық құқық сериясы, 61(1). вилучено із https://bulletin-ir-law.kaznu.kz/index.php/1-mo/article/view/281
Шығарылым
Бөлім
Сыртқы саясат пен халықаралық қатынастардың қазіргі мәселелері
