The Concept of “power” in International Relations: Basic approaches, the analysis, and interpretation
887 452
Кілттік сөздер:
power, class power, structural power – strength, neo-realism in international politicsАннотация
Today power remains one of the most effective means of modern world politics. With the concept power is related one of the central problems of international relations – the problem of war and peace, the problem of conflict and its resolution, the issue of security. On the basis of the “power” the actors are judged on mutual opportunities, make plans of their interaction, make decisions, assess the degree of stability of the international system. Category of “power” plays a significant methodological role in the science of international relations. “Power” is an important instrument of their scientific analysis: the significance of “power factor” there have been discussions between the various scientific and theoretical schools. Power a criterion of diverse models of the system of international relations. In practice this means that the various states are used to take advantage of the different models with «hard» or «soft» power.Библиографиялық сілтемелер
1 Gilpin R. War and Change in World Politics. – Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1981. – P. 13
2 Goodman Jay S. The Concept of «System» in International Relations Theory, Background. – 1965. -Vol.
8, No. 4 (Feb.). – P. 257-268 // The International Studies Association, by Wiley, Article Stable URL: http:// www.jstor.org/stable/3013730
3 Waltz K. N. Refl ection on Theory of International Politics: A Response to My Critics // Neorealism and its Critics / Robert O. Keohane (ed.). – New York: Columbia University Press, 1986. – P. 333
4 Gallie W.B. Essentially Contested Concept // Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society. – 1959, 56. – P.167-93
5 See: Weber M. The Theory of Social and Economic Organization; Wight M. Power Politics. – New York:Holmes and Meier, 1978
6 Spykman N. American Strategy and World Politics: The United States and the Balance of Power. – New York: Harcourt-Brace, 1942
7 Morgenthau H.J. Politics Among Nations: The Struggle for Power and Peace / Alfred A. Knopf. – New York, 1948
8 Waltz K. N. Theory of International Politics / Addison-Wesley. – Melno Park, 1979. – P. 120-121; Waltz K. N. Realist Through and Neorealist Theory // Journal of International Affairs. – 1990. N 44(1). – P. 21-37
9 See: Keohanve R.O., Nye J. S. Power and Interdependence. – Harper Collins 1989; Guzzini S. Structural power: the limits of neorealist power analysis // International Organization. – 1993. – No 47. – P. 443-78; Lukes
St. Power and the Battle for Hearts and Minds: on the Bluntness of “Soft Power” // Power in World Politics /Ed. F. Berenskoetter, M. Williams. – New York: Routledge, 2007
10 Galtung J. East-West Interaction Patterns // Journal of Peace Research. – 1966. – No. 2. – Pp. 146-77
11 Knorr K. The Power of Nations: The Political Economy of International Relations. – New York: Basic Books, 1975. – Pp. 9-10
12 Pruitt D.G. National Power and International Responsiveness. Background. – 1964. – Vol. 7, No. 4
(Feb.). – P. 165-178 // The International Studies Association, by Wiley, Article Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/3013643
13 Nye J. S. Soft Power // Foreign Policy. – 1990. – No. 80 (autumn). Twentieth Anniversary. – P. 153-171;
Nye J. S. Soft Power and American Foreign Policy // Political Science Quarterly. – 2004. – Vol. 119. -No. 2
(Summer). – P. 255-270; Nye J. S. Public Diplomacy and Soft Power // Annals of the American Academy of
Political and Social Science. – 2008. – Vol. 616 (Public Diplomacy in a Changing World). – P. 94-109
14 Singer J. D., Small M. Alliance Aggregation and the Onset of War // Quantitative International Politics
/J. David Singer (ed.). – New York: Free Press, 1968. P.249
15 Hart J. Three Approaches to the Measurement of Power in International Relations // International
Organization. – 1976. – Vol. 30, No. 2 (Spring). – P. 289-305 // University of Wisconsin Press, URL: http:// www.jstor.org/stable/2706260; Holsti K. J. The Concept of Power in the Study of International Relations.
Background, 1964. – Vol. 7, No. 4 (Feb.). – P. 179-194 // The International Studies Association, URL: http://
www.jstor.org/stable/3013644; Dahl R. The Concept of Power // Behavioral Science. – 1957. – N 202, 2 July; Tellis A. J., Bially J., Layne Ch., McPherson M. Measuring National Power in the Postindustrial Age. – Santa Monica, CA: Rand Corporation, 2000. http://www.rand.org/pubs/monograph_reports/MR1110
16 See: Art R. J. The fungibility of force // The use of force: Military power in international politics /Ed.
R. Art and K. Waltz. – Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefi eld, 1996; Campbell K., O’Hallon M. Hard power:
The new politics of national security. New York: Basic Books, 2006; Cooper R. Hard power, soft power and the
goals of diplomacy. I American power in the 21st century / ed. D. Held and M. Koenig-Archibugi, Cambridge,2004. -167-80
17 Barnett M., Duvall R. Power in International Politics // International Organization. – 2005. – No 59 (1).– P. 39-75
18 Bachrach P., Baratz M. Two Faces of Power // American Political Science Review. – 1962. – No 56 (4).– P. 947-52
19 Pollack M. Engines of European Integration: Delegation, Agency and Agenda Setting the EU. – Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2003; Zartman W., Rubin J. Power and Negotiation /Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 2000
2 Goodman Jay S. The Concept of «System» in International Relations Theory, Background. – 1965. -Vol.
8, No. 4 (Feb.). – P. 257-268 // The International Studies Association, by Wiley, Article Stable URL: http:// www.jstor.org/stable/3013730
3 Waltz K. N. Refl ection on Theory of International Politics: A Response to My Critics // Neorealism and its Critics / Robert O. Keohane (ed.). – New York: Columbia University Press, 1986. – P. 333
4 Gallie W.B. Essentially Contested Concept // Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society. – 1959, 56. – P.167-93
5 See: Weber M. The Theory of Social and Economic Organization; Wight M. Power Politics. – New York:Holmes and Meier, 1978
6 Spykman N. American Strategy and World Politics: The United States and the Balance of Power. – New York: Harcourt-Brace, 1942
7 Morgenthau H.J. Politics Among Nations: The Struggle for Power and Peace / Alfred A. Knopf. – New York, 1948
8 Waltz K. N. Theory of International Politics / Addison-Wesley. – Melno Park, 1979. – P. 120-121; Waltz K. N. Realist Through and Neorealist Theory // Journal of International Affairs. – 1990. N 44(1). – P. 21-37
9 See: Keohanve R.O., Nye J. S. Power and Interdependence. – Harper Collins 1989; Guzzini S. Structural power: the limits of neorealist power analysis // International Organization. – 1993. – No 47. – P. 443-78; Lukes
St. Power and the Battle for Hearts and Minds: on the Bluntness of “Soft Power” // Power in World Politics /Ed. F. Berenskoetter, M. Williams. – New York: Routledge, 2007
10 Galtung J. East-West Interaction Patterns // Journal of Peace Research. – 1966. – No. 2. – Pp. 146-77
11 Knorr K. The Power of Nations: The Political Economy of International Relations. – New York: Basic Books, 1975. – Pp. 9-10
12 Pruitt D.G. National Power and International Responsiveness. Background. – 1964. – Vol. 7, No. 4
(Feb.). – P. 165-178 // The International Studies Association, by Wiley, Article Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/3013643
13 Nye J. S. Soft Power // Foreign Policy. – 1990. – No. 80 (autumn). Twentieth Anniversary. – P. 153-171;
Nye J. S. Soft Power and American Foreign Policy // Political Science Quarterly. – 2004. – Vol. 119. -No. 2
(Summer). – P. 255-270; Nye J. S. Public Diplomacy and Soft Power // Annals of the American Academy of
Political and Social Science. – 2008. – Vol. 616 (Public Diplomacy in a Changing World). – P. 94-109
14 Singer J. D., Small M. Alliance Aggregation and the Onset of War // Quantitative International Politics
/J. David Singer (ed.). – New York: Free Press, 1968. P.249
15 Hart J. Three Approaches to the Measurement of Power in International Relations // International
Organization. – 1976. – Vol. 30, No. 2 (Spring). – P. 289-305 // University of Wisconsin Press, URL: http:// www.jstor.org/stable/2706260; Holsti K. J. The Concept of Power in the Study of International Relations.
Background, 1964. – Vol. 7, No. 4 (Feb.). – P. 179-194 // The International Studies Association, URL: http://
www.jstor.org/stable/3013644; Dahl R. The Concept of Power // Behavioral Science. – 1957. – N 202, 2 July; Tellis A. J., Bially J., Layne Ch., McPherson M. Measuring National Power in the Postindustrial Age. – Santa Monica, CA: Rand Corporation, 2000. http://www.rand.org/pubs/monograph_reports/MR1110
16 See: Art R. J. The fungibility of force // The use of force: Military power in international politics /Ed.
R. Art and K. Waltz. – Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefi eld, 1996; Campbell K., O’Hallon M. Hard power:
The new politics of national security. New York: Basic Books, 2006; Cooper R. Hard power, soft power and the
goals of diplomacy. I American power in the 21st century / ed. D. Held and M. Koenig-Archibugi, Cambridge,2004. -167-80
17 Barnett M., Duvall R. Power in International Politics // International Organization. – 2005. – No 59 (1).– P. 39-75
18 Bachrach P., Baratz M. Two Faces of Power // American Political Science Review. – 1962. – No 56 (4).– P. 947-52
19 Pollack M. Engines of European Integration: Delegation, Agency and Agenda Setting the EU. – Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2003; Zartman W., Rubin J. Power and Negotiation /Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 2000
Жүктелулер
Шығарылым
Бөлім
Сыртқы саясат пен халықаралық қатынастардың қазіргі мәселелері
