Legal personality of the individual in international law: from its non-recognition to absolute recognition
Keywords:
personality of the individual, human rights, international criminal court, responsibility,Abstract
In this article it is analysed that rights and liberties of individuals determined in international legal documents first of all, regarded demonstration of will of state, the majority of international rules on human rights are abstract and for implementation of such norms rises the need of the establishment of intrastate acts. The disparities in understanding the concept of international law subject explain the lack of international legal instruments that could ascertain the exact legal positions of natural persons in question. By a thorough analysis of legal sources, the authors aimed at identifying both general legal parameters of legal personality representation in international law and its individual forms in particular, such as the rights of migrants, refugees, victims of armed conflicts, and investors as economic bloc representatives. The research demonstrates that as opposed to the positions maintained in foreign scientific literature, which tend to treat individuals as subjects of international law, the dominant point of view in the Russian doctrine of international law is the one suggesting that these persons are not subjects of international public law. In the submitted article, the authors entered upon formation of context perception of legal personality and believe that further research might be focused on assessing the degree of compliance of national legislations in coalitions.References
1 Konvencija o zashhite prav cheloveka i osnovnyh svobod (Rim, 4 nojabrja 1950 g.) (s izmenenijami ot 21 sentjabrja 1970 g., 20 dekabrja 1971 g., 1 janvarja, 6 nojabrja 1990 g., 11 maja 1994 g.). ETS N 005.
2 Steen-Johnsen K., Enjolras B. The Fear of Offending: Social Norms and Freedom of Expression // Society. 2016. Volume 53. Issue 4. Pp. 352-362.
3 Froholdt L.L. Coping with Captivity in a maritime hijacking situation // WMU Journal of Maritime Affairs. 2016. Issue 1. Pp. 1-20.
4 Bagheri M., Jahromi M.J.G. Globalization and extraterritorial application of economic regulation: crisis in international law and balancing interests // European Journal of Law and Economics. 2016. Volume 41. Issue 2. Pp. 393-429.
5 Chiao V. What is the Criminal Law for? // Law and Philosophy. 2016. Volume 35. Issue 2. Pp. 137-163.
6 Staub-Bernasconi S. Social Work and Human Rights—Linking Two Traditions of Human Rights in Social Work // Journal of Human Rights and Social Work. 2016. Volume 1. Issue 1. Pp. 40–49.
7 Mesel B.D. How Morality Can Be Absent from Moral Arguments // Argumentation. 2016. Issue 1. Pp. 1-21.
8 Balfe M. Why Did U.S. Healthcare Professionals Become Involved in Torture During the War on Terror? // Journal of Bioethical Inquiry. 2016. Issue 1. Pp. 1-12.
9 CJCE. 05.02.63. Van Grend et Loos / Administration fiscale neerlandaise, aff. 26 – 62. Rec. 5.02.63. P. 25
10 International Court of Justice. Legality of the use by a state of nuclear weapons in armed conflict. Advisory opinion of 8 July 1996; International Court of Justice. Legality of the threat or use of nuclear weapons. Advisory opinion of 8 July 1996.
11 UNHCR – The 1951 Refugee Convention. http://www.unhcr.org/pages/49da0e466.html
12 International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights. United Nations. 6 March 2012. Retrieved 2012-03-06.
Protocol Relating to the Status of Refugees of 31 January 1967. http://www.unhcr.org/3b66c2aa10.html
13 Universal Declaration of Human Rights. http://www.un.org/en/universal-declaration-human-rights/index.html
14 International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (ICESCR). Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights. Retrieved 23 March 2013
15 S/RES/1889(2009).https://documents-dds-ny.un.org/doc/UNDOC/GEN/N09/542/55/PDF/N0954255.pdf?OpenElement
16 Mamedov U.Ju. Mezhdunarodnaja pravosub#ektnost’: osnovnye tendencii razvitija. Avtoreferat diss.kand. jurid.nauk –Kazan’,2002,s.26
2 Steen-Johnsen K., Enjolras B. The Fear of Offending: Social Norms and Freedom of Expression // Society. 2016. Volume 53. Issue 4. Pp. 352-362.
3 Froholdt L.L. Coping with Captivity in a maritime hijacking situation // WMU Journal of Maritime Affairs. 2016. Issue 1. Pp. 1-20.
4 Bagheri M., Jahromi M.J.G. Globalization and extraterritorial application of economic regulation: crisis in international law and balancing interests // European Journal of Law and Economics. 2016. Volume 41. Issue 2. Pp. 393-429.
5 Chiao V. What is the Criminal Law for? // Law and Philosophy. 2016. Volume 35. Issue 2. Pp. 137-163.
6 Staub-Bernasconi S. Social Work and Human Rights—Linking Two Traditions of Human Rights in Social Work // Journal of Human Rights and Social Work. 2016. Volume 1. Issue 1. Pp. 40–49.
7 Mesel B.D. How Morality Can Be Absent from Moral Arguments // Argumentation. 2016. Issue 1. Pp. 1-21.
8 Balfe M. Why Did U.S. Healthcare Professionals Become Involved in Torture During the War on Terror? // Journal of Bioethical Inquiry. 2016. Issue 1. Pp. 1-12.
9 CJCE. 05.02.63. Van Grend et Loos / Administration fiscale neerlandaise, aff. 26 – 62. Rec. 5.02.63. P. 25
10 International Court of Justice. Legality of the use by a state of nuclear weapons in armed conflict. Advisory opinion of 8 July 1996; International Court of Justice. Legality of the threat or use of nuclear weapons. Advisory opinion of 8 July 1996.
11 UNHCR – The 1951 Refugee Convention. http://www.unhcr.org/pages/49da0e466.html
12 International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights. United Nations. 6 March 2012. Retrieved 2012-03-06.
Protocol Relating to the Status of Refugees of 31 January 1967. http://www.unhcr.org/3b66c2aa10.html
13 Universal Declaration of Human Rights. http://www.un.org/en/universal-declaration-human-rights/index.html
14 International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (ICESCR). Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights. Retrieved 23 March 2013
15 S/RES/1889(2009).https://documents-dds-ny.un.org/doc/UNDOC/GEN/N09/542/55/PDF/N0954255.pdf?OpenElement
16 Mamedov U.Ju. Mezhdunarodnaja pravosub#ektnost’: osnovnye tendencii razvitija. Avtoreferat diss.kand. jurid.nauk –Kazan’,2002,s.26
Downloads
How to Cite
Nyssanbekova, L. B., & Sairambayeva Z. Т. (2017). Legal personality of the individual in international law: from its non-recognition to absolute recognition. International Relations and International Law Journal, 75(3). Retrieved from https://bulletin-ir-law.kaznu.kz/index.php/1-mo/article/view/707
Issue
Section
International relations and foreign policy