On the scientific definition of the subject as a sphere of forensic practice
54 31
Keywords:
scientific and practical knowledge, legitimacy of objective reality, factual data, cicumstances, subject of forensic investigation, tasks, issues, objects, special knowledge,Abstract
The article deals with the problematic issues of the scientific definition of the notion and the essence of the subject of forensic examination. In this regard the author analyzes the views of scientists-criminalists and lawyers-practitioners who have researched the aspect of expertise knowledge and expressed controversial opinions on the subject of the forensic examination as a practical activity. Referring to the critical analysis of the suggested scientific definitions given in special literature, the difference between such notions as «subject», «tasks», «questions» and «objects» has been considered in the article. Besides, the author expresses his vision on the solution of theoretical questions in the course of analyzing the problem under consideration, which is of great practical significance from the point of its substantiated application in the judicial process of the notional apparatus of the forensic expertise.References
1 B elkin R.S. Kurs sovetskoi kriminalistiki. T. 2. – M.: Yurid. lit., 1988. – S. 256–261.
2 S hlyahovA.R. Predmet, metodisistemasovets koinaukikrimin alisticheskoiekspertizy // Vopr.kriminalistikiisudebnoiekspertizy
– Alma-Ata: Izd-voKazahskogoun-ta, 1959. – S. 12–32; Predmet, ob’ekty, metodikaipravovyeosnovysudebnyhekspertiz
// Naznachenieiproizvodstvosudebnyhekspertiz: Posobiedlyasledova telei, sudeiiekspertov – M.: Yurid. lit., 1988. Gl. 1. – S.7–14.
3 MirskiyD. Ya.Predmet i sistema fototehnicheskoi ekspertizy // Teoret.vopr. sudebnoi ekspertizy – M., 1981. (Sb. nauch. tr.
VNIISE ; Vyp. 48). – S. 57.
4 S elivanov N.A. Spornye voprosy sudebnoi ekspertizy // Sots. zakonnost’. – 1978. – № 6. – S. 63.
5 O rlov Yu.K. Proizvodstvo elspertizy v ugolovnom protsesse… S. 11.
6 S himanova Z.E. Pozharno-tehnicheskaya ekspertiza. – M., 1963.
7 L isichenko V.K. K voprosu o predmete i sisteme kriminalisticheskoi ekspertizy // Materialy 4-i rash. konf. sudebnyh medikov
i kriminalistov. – Kiev, 1959. – S. 328–331.
8 S egai M.Ya. Nekotorye voprosy sudebnoi ekspertizy veshchestvennyh dokazatel’stv // Teoret.i protsess. voprosy sudebnoi
ekspertizy. – M., 1961. Vyp. 1. – S. 76–78.
9 B elkin R.S. Kriminalistika: problem, tendentsii, perspektivy. Ot teorii k praktike – M.,Yurid.lit., 1988. – S. 64.
10 Predmetpoznaniya // Filos.slov. 4-e izd. – M.: Politizdat, 1980. – S. 292.
11 S teputenkova V.K. Sudebnaya ekspertiza i issledovanie obstoyatel‘stv, obrazuyushchih sostav prestupleniya – M., 1975. (Sb.
nauch. tr. VNIISE ; Vyp. 20). – S. 58–59.
2 S hlyahovA.R. Predmet, metodisistemasovets koinaukikrimin alisticheskoiekspertizy // Vopr.kriminalistikiisudebnoiekspertizy
– Alma-Ata: Izd-voKazahskogoun-ta, 1959. – S. 12–32; Predmet, ob’ekty, metodikaipravovyeosnovysudebnyhekspertiz
// Naznachenieiproizvodstvosudebnyhekspertiz: Posobiedlyasledova telei, sudeiiekspertov – M.: Yurid. lit., 1988. Gl. 1. – S.7–14.
3 MirskiyD. Ya.Predmet i sistema fototehnicheskoi ekspertizy // Teoret.vopr. sudebnoi ekspertizy – M., 1981. (Sb. nauch. tr.
VNIISE ; Vyp. 48). – S. 57.
4 S elivanov N.A. Spornye voprosy sudebnoi ekspertizy // Sots. zakonnost’. – 1978. – № 6. – S. 63.
5 O rlov Yu.K. Proizvodstvo elspertizy v ugolovnom protsesse… S. 11.
6 S himanova Z.E. Pozharno-tehnicheskaya ekspertiza. – M., 1963.
7 L isichenko V.K. K voprosu o predmete i sisteme kriminalisticheskoi ekspertizy // Materialy 4-i rash. konf. sudebnyh medikov
i kriminalistov. – Kiev, 1959. – S. 328–331.
8 S egai M.Ya. Nekotorye voprosy sudebnoi ekspertizy veshchestvennyh dokazatel’stv // Teoret.i protsess. voprosy sudebnoi
ekspertizy. – M., 1961. Vyp. 1. – S. 76–78.
9 B elkin R.S. Kriminalistika: problem, tendentsii, perspektivy. Ot teorii k praktike – M.,Yurid.lit., 1988. – S. 64.
10 Predmetpoznaniya // Filos.slov. 4-e izd. – M.: Politizdat, 1980. – S. 292.
11 S teputenkova V.K. Sudebnaya ekspertiza i issledovanie obstoyatel‘stv, obrazuyushchih sostav prestupleniya – M., 1975. (Sb.
nauch. tr. VNIISE ; Vyp. 20). – S. 58–59.
Downloads
How to Cite
Shakirov К. N. (2016). On the scientific definition of the subject as a sphere of forensic practice. International Relations and International Law Journal, 68(4). Retrieved from https://bulletin-ir-law.kaznu.kz/index.php/1-mo/article/view/617
Issue
Section
International relations and foreign policy
