«The New Great Game» in Central Asia: the USА role
130 82
Keywords:
Central Asia, the Great Game, the problem, the US policy, history, geopolitics,Abstract
The purpose of this article is to examine the definitions in US policy, which is one of the key players in the «Great Game» in Central Asia. The article deals with the basic theory and practical aspects of the «Great Game.» A key component in the creation of the «Great Game» was the competition for Central Asia, as well as in the article data between any countries conducted this rivalry. The authors analyzes the new position, the current agenda of the United States in the «Great Game» and a number of reasons for such a high interest in Central Asia. If you look at history, it is revealed that the US policy in Central Asia have gone through several phases, which have their own characteristics. These in turn affect a number of objective and subjective factors. Estimations and comment on the Role and opinions of the United States in the «New Silk Road» which is carried out on a global level.References
1 Menon Raja. (2003). The New Great Game in Central Asia. Survival, Vol.45, No.2, Summer: 187-204.
2 Edwards Matthew (2003). The New Great Game and the New Great Gamers: Disciples of Kipling and Mackinder. Central Asian Survey, Vol.22, March: 83-102.
3 Luong, Pauline Jones and Erika Weinthal (2002). New Friends, New Fears in Central Asia. Foreign Affairs. Vol.81, No.2, March-April: 61.
4 White House (1999) National Security Strategy for a New Century. Washington, DC, December. See also the law: The Silk Road Strategy Act. 1999, 106th Congress, 1st Session: 1–5.
5 Butler Kenley (2001). U.S. Military Cooperation with the Central Asian States. Monterey Institute of International Studies, September 17.
6 Talbott Strobe (1997). A Farewell to Flashman: American Policy in the Caucasus and Central Asia. Address at the Johns Hopkins School of Advanced International Studies, Washington, DC, July 21.
7 Blank Stephen (2000). The United States and Central Asia. In: Central Asian Security, the New International Context.Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution Press: 130.
8 Hill Fiona (2001). Une strategie incertaine: la politique des Etats-Unis dans le Caucase et en Asie centrale. Politique Etrangere. Fevrier, No.1: 95–108.
9 Wishnick Elizabeth (2002). The Growing U.S. Security Interests in Central Asia. Strategic Studies Institute, U.S. Army War
College, October: 3.
10 Rumsfeld Donald (2005) Q&A: U.S. Military Bases in Central Asia, July 26 http://www.nytimes.com/cfr/international/
slot2_072605.html (seen 19.02.2015).
11 Starr, S. Frederick (2005) A ‘Greater Central Asia partnership’ for Central Asia and its neighbors. Washington, DC: Central
Asia-Caucasus Institute and Silk Road Studies Program.
12 Fedorenco Vladimir (2013) The New Silk Road initiatives in Central Asia. Rethink paper 10, August www.rethinkinstitute.
org/.
13 Mankoff, Jeffrey (2013). The United States and Central Asia. A report of the CSIS Russia and Eurasia program.
14 Blake Robert (2013) Assistant Secretary South and Central Asian Affairs Robert O. Blake, Jr. with ETV, Shalinder Wangu. www.newdelhi.usembassy.gov/sr130220b.html, February 19 (seen 19.04.2015).
15 Popov Dmitriy (2013) Tsentral’naya Aziya v strategii SShA posle 2014 g. (Central Asia in the US strategy after 2014). www.imperiya.by/comments.html?id=16333 (seen 19.04.2015).
16 Makhmudov Rustam (2013) 2014 god i perezagruzka «bol’shoi igry» v Tsentral’noi Azii (2014 and the reset of «great game in Central Asia»). www.old.review.uz/ru/article/668 (seen 19.04.2015).
17 «Expert Online» (2014) Bol’shaya igra v Tsentral’noi Azii (The great game in Central Asia) www.expert.ru/2014/11/14/kazahstan-pretenduet-na-osobuyu-rol-v-mirovoj-politike/ (seen 19.04.2015).
18 Tolegenov Baurzhan (2014) Vozrozhdenie «Shelkovogo puti» budet ne shelkovym (The revival of «The Silk way» will be not silk). www.sayasat.org/articles/1065-vozrozhdjenie-shelkovogo-puti-budjet-ne-shelkovym (seen 19.04.2015).
19 Donelli Ted (2012) Ferghana as FATA? A post-2014 strategy for Central Asia. United States Army War College.
20 Dzhalilov Komeb (2014) Aktivizaciya «Novoy bol’shoi igry» v Tsentral’noi Azii (The Activization of the «New great game» in Centra Asia). www.geopolitica.ru/article/aktivizaciya-novoy-bolshoy-igry-v-centralnoy-azii#.VSzaevDQzcc (seen 19.04.2015).
21 Jones Jr. James (2013) Central Asia Can’t Be Forgotten www.nationalinterest.org/commentary/central-asia-cant-be-forgotten-8886, August 14 (seen 18.03.2015).
2 Edwards Matthew (2003). The New Great Game and the New Great Gamers: Disciples of Kipling and Mackinder. Central Asian Survey, Vol.22, March: 83-102.
3 Luong, Pauline Jones and Erika Weinthal (2002). New Friends, New Fears in Central Asia. Foreign Affairs. Vol.81, No.2, March-April: 61.
4 White House (1999) National Security Strategy for a New Century. Washington, DC, December. See also the law: The Silk Road Strategy Act. 1999, 106th Congress, 1st Session: 1–5.
5 Butler Kenley (2001). U.S. Military Cooperation with the Central Asian States. Monterey Institute of International Studies, September 17.
6 Talbott Strobe (1997). A Farewell to Flashman: American Policy in the Caucasus and Central Asia. Address at the Johns Hopkins School of Advanced International Studies, Washington, DC, July 21.
7 Blank Stephen (2000). The United States and Central Asia. In: Central Asian Security, the New International Context.Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution Press: 130.
8 Hill Fiona (2001). Une strategie incertaine: la politique des Etats-Unis dans le Caucase et en Asie centrale. Politique Etrangere. Fevrier, No.1: 95–108.
9 Wishnick Elizabeth (2002). The Growing U.S. Security Interests in Central Asia. Strategic Studies Institute, U.S. Army War
College, October: 3.
10 Rumsfeld Donald (2005) Q&A: U.S. Military Bases in Central Asia, July 26 http://www.nytimes.com/cfr/international/
slot2_072605.html (seen 19.02.2015).
11 Starr, S. Frederick (2005) A ‘Greater Central Asia partnership’ for Central Asia and its neighbors. Washington, DC: Central
Asia-Caucasus Institute and Silk Road Studies Program.
12 Fedorenco Vladimir (2013) The New Silk Road initiatives in Central Asia. Rethink paper 10, August www.rethinkinstitute.
org/.
13 Mankoff, Jeffrey (2013). The United States and Central Asia. A report of the CSIS Russia and Eurasia program.
14 Blake Robert (2013) Assistant Secretary South and Central Asian Affairs Robert O. Blake, Jr. with ETV, Shalinder Wangu. www.newdelhi.usembassy.gov/sr130220b.html, February 19 (seen 19.04.2015).
15 Popov Dmitriy (2013) Tsentral’naya Aziya v strategii SShA posle 2014 g. (Central Asia in the US strategy after 2014). www.imperiya.by/comments.html?id=16333 (seen 19.04.2015).
16 Makhmudov Rustam (2013) 2014 god i perezagruzka «bol’shoi igry» v Tsentral’noi Azii (2014 and the reset of «great game in Central Asia»). www.old.review.uz/ru/article/668 (seen 19.04.2015).
17 «Expert Online» (2014) Bol’shaya igra v Tsentral’noi Azii (The great game in Central Asia) www.expert.ru/2014/11/14/kazahstan-pretenduet-na-osobuyu-rol-v-mirovoj-politike/ (seen 19.04.2015).
18 Tolegenov Baurzhan (2014) Vozrozhdenie «Shelkovogo puti» budet ne shelkovym (The revival of «The Silk way» will be not silk). www.sayasat.org/articles/1065-vozrozhdjenie-shelkovogo-puti-budjet-ne-shelkovym (seen 19.04.2015).
19 Donelli Ted (2012) Ferghana as FATA? A post-2014 strategy for Central Asia. United States Army War College.
20 Dzhalilov Komeb (2014) Aktivizaciya «Novoy bol’shoi igry» v Tsentral’noi Azii (The Activization of the «New great game» in Centra Asia). www.geopolitica.ru/article/aktivizaciya-novoy-bolshoy-igry-v-centralnoy-azii#.VSzaevDQzcc (seen 19.04.2015).
21 Jones Jr. James (2013) Central Asia Can’t Be Forgotten www.nationalinterest.org/commentary/central-asia-cant-be-forgotten-8886, August 14 (seen 18.03.2015).
Downloads
How to Cite
Балаубаева Б. M., & Кожахметов O. К. (2016). «The New Great Game» in Central Asia: the USА role. International Relations and International Law Journal, 72(4). Retrieved from https://bulletin-ir-law.kaznu.kz/index.php/1-mo/article/view/371
Issue
Section
International relations and foreign policy
