Concept of efficiency of criminal law

Authors

  • S. М. Apenov
        40 22

Keywords:

the criminal law, legal reform, efficiency of the right, a right inefficiency, sociology of law, partnership in a crime, co-performance,

Abstract

This article considered one of the problems of sociology of criminal law – questions of efficiency of criminal law. Need of studying of a problem of efficiency of criminal law is that reforming of the criminal legislation and the subsequent modification and additions of its contents have to answer goals during the legislative work and to the tasks established in criminal legislation. Considering features of legal system of the state, during research the conclusion that efficiency of action of each branch of the right is determined by specific signs which proceed from the purposes and problems of the law. Efficiency of action of the right though represents the generalized concept, however, degree of efficiency of the right during action of one criminal legislation can be various depending on realization of a goal and problems of the law which in sociology of criminal law means criteria of efficiency of the law. For ensuring applied character of the touched subject in article some questions of partnership in a criminal offense are studied.

References

1 Karbon’e Zh. Yuridicheskaya sotsiologiya. –M.: Progress, 1986. –S.34.
2 Dzhekebaev U.S. Osnovnye printsipy ugolovnogo prava Respubliki Kazakhstan (Sravnitel’nyi kommentariy k knige Dzh. Fletchera I A.V. Naumova «Osnovnye kontseptsiy sovremennogo ugolovnogo prava»). –Almaty: Zheti Zhargy, 2001. –S. 4.
3 Kul’char K. Osnovy sociologii i prava. –M.: Progress, 1981. –S. 343.
4 Tel’nov P.F. Otvetstvennost’ za souchastie v prestuplenii. –M.: Yuridicheskaya literatura, 1974. –S. 144-145.
5 Galiakbarov R.R. Kvalifikatsiya gruppovyh prestupleniy. –M.: Yuridicheskaya literatura, 1980. –S. 31-32.
6 Sovetskoe ugolovnoe pravo. Chast’ Obshaya /pod.red.: P.I.Grishaeva, B.V.Zdravomyslova. –M.: Yuridicheskaya literatura, 1982. –S. 234.
7 Ushakov A.V. Otvetstvennost’ za gruppovye prestupleniya: obshye voprosu –Kalinin: Kalininskiy universitet, 1975. –S. 51.
8 Sbornik postanovleniy Plenuma Verhovnogo Suda Kazakhskoi SSR, Plenuma Verhovnogo Suda Respubliki Kazakhstan, normativnyh postanovleniy Verhovnogo Suda Respubliki Kazakhstan. –Almaty: norma-K, 2005. –S. 234.
9 Kudryavtsev V.N. Obshaya teoriya kvalifikatsii prestupleniy. –M.:Yurist, 2001. –S. 220.
10 Trainin A.N. Obshee uchenie o sostave prestupleniya. –M.: Gosyurizdat, 1957. –S. 21.
11 Geta M.R. Gmanizatsiya ugolovnoi politiki Respubliki Kazakhstan. –Almaty, 2004. –S. 110-111.
12 Kudryavtsev V.N., Nikitinskiy V.I., Samoshenko I.S., Glazyrin V.V. Effektivnost’ pravovyh norm. –M.: Yuridicheskaya literatura, 1980. –S. 156.
13 Lapaeva V.V. Sotsiologiya prava. Kratkiy uchebnyi kurs. –M.: Norma, 2000. –S. 212.

Downloads