Security of Central Asian region after 2014 and the Military Doctrine of Kazakhstan

Авторлар

  • M. Ш. Губайдуллина
  • Б. Сариева
        158 31

Кілттік сөздер:

Security, Central Asia states, Afghanistan, NATO troops, security forces, military violence, terrorism,

Аннотация

This study assesses the security interests and concerns for each of the Central States in response to the progressive withdrawal of U.S. and NATO troops through 2014, as well as their associated political wills and capacities to implement them individually or collectively. As it evolves throughout its security, political, and economic transitions, the stability of the region is also directly affected by the success or failure of their initiatives. The Central Asian countries and other northern neighbors are concerned that Afghanistan’s security forces will not be ready to carry the responsibility of autonomously maintaining stability in the country, in order to foster the political and economic developments required to protect and implement their bi-lateral or multi-lateral initiatives for Afghanistan’s future.

Библиографиялық сілтемелер

1 Obama, Barack. Afghanistan withdrawal: 33,000 troops will leave next year // The Guardian, 23 june 2011: <http://www. theguardian.com/world/2011/jun/23/afghanistan-withdrawal-barack-obama-troops>
2 Krambs, Timothy A. Central Asia and the Afghanistan Security Dilemma: Amelioration, Retrograde, or Status Quo? Central
Asia’s Role in Regional Security Regarding Afghanistan after 2014 // PfP Consortium Quarterly Journal Spring 2013 / Partnership for
Peace Consortium (PfPC) of Defense Academies and Security Studies Institutes, Garmisch-Partenkirchen, Germany. <http://www.isn.
ethz.ch/Digital-Library/Publications/Detail/?ots591=0c54e3b3-1e9c-be1e-2c24-a6a8c7060233&lng=en&id=178171>
3 Central Asia after 2014. Report , Nov. 2013/ Ed. Stephen J. Blank. – Strategic Studies Institute and U.S. Army War College Press,
U.S. Army War College, 2013. – P. 26.<ww.StrategicStudiesInstitute.army.mil/newsletter>
4 Why Russia is worried about the “Zero Option” in Afghanistan // The Diplomat: <http://thediplomat.com/2013/08/why-russiais-
worried-about-the-zero-option-in-afghanistan/>
5 Freedom in the World. 2012. Report. Issues: Regions – Eurasia: <http://www.freedomhouse.org/reports#.U1Zz2vvojcc>
6 Brothers in Misfortune: Kazakhstan Is Losing Its Status as an “Island of Stability”// Moskovskiy Komsomolets, 18 September,
2011
7 Kazakhstan Calls for Stabilisation in Afghanistan through Diplomacy and Development // Eurodialogue:<http://eurodialogue.
org/Kazakhstan-Calls-for-Stabilisation-in-Afghanistan-through-Diplomacy-and-Development>
8 Military Doctrine of the Republic of Kazakhstan. APPROVED by order No. 161 of the President of the Republic of Kazakhstan.
October 11, 2011 // DubovtsevG. The Republic of Kazakhstan Update: Military Doctrine and Policy / Ed. by Charles Bartles, FMSO
(2011): < http://fmso.leavenworth.army.mil/Collaboration/international/Kazakhstan/Republic-Update-Military-Doctrine-and-Policy.
pdf>
9 Law on National Security: Nazarbayev Held a Meeting of Kazakhstan’s Security Council // Kazakhstanskaya Pravda, 17 Januarym 2012: <http://en.tengrinews.kz/politics_sub/5306/>
10 McDermott, Roger N. Touching the Void: Security Vacuum Issues in Central Asia // Jane’s Intelligence Review, April, 2013
11 Kosolapova E. Afghanistan is looking for partners who will ensure security in the country after U.S. troops leave Afghanistan
// Trend, December, 2013

Жүктелулер

Шығарылым

Бөлім

Сыртқы саясат пен халықаралық қатынастардың қазіргі мәселелері