US immigration policy: Trends and Results
94 32
Keywords:
US immigration policy, the US Labor Department, the Immigration Act,Abstract
US immigration policyis influenced byseveral factors,notgiving thedevelopment of effectivepolicymaking in this area.These factors include, in particular, the impact of volatilepublic mood, lack of understanding of socialandeconomic nature ofimmigration, the current practice isfavored bythe indigenous populationof the countryat the expense ofvisiting foreigners, as well as variouspolitical considerations. Immigration tothe United Statesa number of reasons. In the extensiveliteraturenamed,amongothers, the following: the availability of social networksthat promotemigration, lack of jobs at homeimmigrantsneedthe US economyfor cheap labor.References
1 Magaña L., US immigration policy: Trends and Results// Otechestvennie zapiski. – №4 (19). – 2004. – S. 24-25.
2 Calavita K., Inside the State: The Bracero Program, Immigration, and the INS. – NewYork, NY, 1992. – P. 123-124.
3 Massey D.S., Alarcon R., Gonzalez H., Durand J., Return to Atzlan: The Social Process of International Migration from
Western Mexico. Berkeley and Los Angeles, 1987. – P.14-17.
4 S assen S., The Mobility of Labor and Capital. – New York, 1994. – P. 54-56.
5 Cornelius W.A. «The Structural Embeddedness of Demand for Mexican Immigrant Labor: New Evidence from California,»
in: Suarez-Orozco M. M. (Ed.), Crossings: Mexican Immigration in Interdisciplinary Perspectives, Cambridge, MA, 1998. –Р.113–115.
6 Fix M. E., and Passel J. S., Immigration and Immigrants: Setting the Record Straight. – Washington, D. C., 1994. – P. 345-
346.
7 Wilson, «Theoretical Approaches to Mexican Wage Labor Migration,» in: D. Y. Hamamoto, R. D. Torres (Eds.), New American
Destinies: A reader in Contemporary Asian and Latino Immigration. – New York, NY, 1997. – P. 47–72.
2 Calavita K., Inside the State: The Bracero Program, Immigration, and the INS. – NewYork, NY, 1992. – P. 123-124.
3 Massey D.S., Alarcon R., Gonzalez H., Durand J., Return to Atzlan: The Social Process of International Migration from
Western Mexico. Berkeley and Los Angeles, 1987. – P.14-17.
4 S assen S., The Mobility of Labor and Capital. – New York, 1994. – P. 54-56.
5 Cornelius W.A. «The Structural Embeddedness of Demand for Mexican Immigrant Labor: New Evidence from California,»
in: Suarez-Orozco M. M. (Ed.), Crossings: Mexican Immigration in Interdisciplinary Perspectives, Cambridge, MA, 1998. –Р.113–115.
6 Fix M. E., and Passel J. S., Immigration and Immigrants: Setting the Record Straight. – Washington, D. C., 1994. – P. 345-
346.
7 Wilson, «Theoretical Approaches to Mexican Wage Labor Migration,» in: D. Y. Hamamoto, R. D. Torres (Eds.), New American
Destinies: A reader in Contemporary Asian and Latino Immigration. – New York, NY, 1997. – P. 47–72.
Downloads
How to Cite
Alipkyzy, R., & Chukubayev Е. S. (2016). US immigration policy: Trends and Results. International Relations and International Law Journal, 68(4). Retrieved from https://bulletin-ir-law.kaznu.kz/index.php/1-mo/article/view/604
Issue
Section
International relations and foreign policy
