Socially dangerous consequence as one of conditions of social conditionality of norms of criminal law
Keywords:
socially dangerous consequence, material structure, formal structure, the remote consequences of a criminal offense,Abstract
In article objective signs of structure of a criminal offense, action or inaction and its public and dangerous consequences are exposed social legal to the analysis. Need of studying of the question posed is that at establishment of a criminal and legal ban to this or that act the legislation has to consider a measure of intensity of socially dangerous act which at the correct assessment would provide justice and stability of norms of criminal law and differentiation of administrative offense from a criminal offense. According to the author, the sociological analysis of criminal and legal problems shouldn’t will extend on sanity and age of the person who made socially dangerous act. As the reason of it serves that fact that not only the criminal law, but also all branches of the right provide behavior and responsibility of the responsible person capable to bear legal responsibility.References
1 Spiridonov L.I. Sociologija ugolovnogo prava. – M.: Juridicheskaja literatura, 1986. – S. 37.
2 Zemljukov S.V. Ugolovno-pravovye problemy prestupnogo vreda. – Novosibirsk, 1991. – S. 67.
3 Ugolovnoe prao. Obshhaja chast’. – M.: Novyj jurist’, 1997. – S. 213.
4 Ugolovnoe pravo. Obshhaja chast’. – M.: Norma, 1997. – S. 153.
5 Babaev M.M. Social’nye posledstvija prestupnosti. – M., 1982. – S. 9-10.
6 Ugolovnoe pravo Respubliki Kazahstan (Obshhaja chast’) / pod red.: prof. I.I. Rogo-va i prof. S.M. Rahmetova. – Almaty:Norma-K, 2005. – S. 63.
7 Kurs ugolovnogo prava /pod red.: N.F. Kuznecovoj, I.M. Tjazhkovoj. T. 1. – M.: Zer-calo, 1992. – S. 228.
8 Sbornik postanavlenij Plenuma Verhovnogo Suda Kazahskoj SSR, Plenuma Ver-hovnogo Suda Respubliki Kazahstan, normativnyh postanovlenij Verhovnogo Suda Res-publiki Kazahstan. – Almaty: Norma-K, 2005. – S. 77.
2 Zemljukov S.V. Ugolovno-pravovye problemy prestupnogo vreda. – Novosibirsk, 1991. – S. 67.
3 Ugolovnoe prao. Obshhaja chast’. – M.: Novyj jurist’, 1997. – S. 213.
4 Ugolovnoe pravo. Obshhaja chast’. – M.: Norma, 1997. – S. 153.
5 Babaev M.M. Social’nye posledstvija prestupnosti. – M., 1982. – S. 9-10.
6 Ugolovnoe pravo Respubliki Kazahstan (Obshhaja chast’) / pod red.: prof. I.I. Rogo-va i prof. S.M. Rahmetova. – Almaty:Norma-K, 2005. – S. 63.
7 Kurs ugolovnogo prava /pod red.: N.F. Kuznecovoj, I.M. Tjazhkovoj. T. 1. – M.: Zer-calo, 1992. – S. 228.
8 Sbornik postanavlenij Plenuma Verhovnogo Suda Kazahskoj SSR, Plenuma Ver-hovnogo Suda Respubliki Kazahstan, normativnyh postanovlenij Verhovnogo Suda Res-publiki Kazahstan. – Almaty: Norma-K, 2005. – S. 77.
Downloads
Issue
Section
International relations and foreign policy
