The scientific validity of the criminal law as a condition of their effectiveness (or theoretical and practical issues of classification of forms of participation)
22 30
Keywords:
complicity in crimes, committed crime by a group of persons, simple complicity, organized group, criminal community,Abstract
The article describes one of the problems of the general criminal law - the classification of forms of participation and examined the extent to which current legislative wording theoretical and practical requirements of criminal law. During the analysis of Article 31 of the Criminal Code of the Republic of Kazakhstan revealed its inconsistency above requirements for several reasons. First, the shape of the penal code, are not able to cover all of its criminal acts committed in complicity, namely in complicity with the distribution of roles, which is the essence of this legal institution. Second, the theory of criminal law, the crime was committed by group of persons is regarded as a form of complicity, not all its forms in the aggregate. Third, the new criminal law of the Republic of Kazakhstan refuses the concept of «forms of complicity». The author of article sees the reason for such refusal in the discussion of scientists on the issue of differentiation of types and forms of participation. On this occasion, the article offers solutions.References
1 Kazakstanskaya pravda. 1995, 18 marta.
2 Telnov P.F. Otvetstvennost za souchastie v prestuplenii. – М.: yuridicheskaya literatura, 1974. –S.113-145.
3 aliakbarov R.R. Kvalifikatsiya gruppovuh prestuplenii. – М.: yuridicheskaya literatura 1980. –S.6.
4 rhivnue materialy Verhovnogo Suda Respubliki Kazakstan. № 2 к 18/2-96.
5 Kurs sovetskogo ugolovnogo prava. / Pod red. А.А. Piontkovskogo. Тom 2. – М.: Gosyurizdat, 1970. –S. 470-471.
6 Burchak F.G. Uchenie o souchasti po sovetskomu ugolovnomy pravu. – Kiev, 1969. –S.145-146
7 Sbornik postanavleniy Plenuma Verhovnogo Suda Kazahskoi SSR, Plenuma Verhovnogo Suda Respubliki, normativnyh
postanovlenii Verhovnogo Suda Respubliki Kazakstan. – Almaty: Norma-К, 2005. – S.406.
8 ommentariy k Ugolovnomy kodeksu Respubliki Kazakstan. –Аlmaty,: Jetu Jargy 2000. –S.78
9 Sudebnaya praktika po ugolovnym delam Verhovnogo Suda Respubliki Kazakstan. – Аstana: ZAO «Bi-Logistika», 2003.– S.10-11
10 golovnyi kodeks Rossiskoi Federatsi. –Мoskva: Ekcmo, 2002.
11 rishaevP.I., Kriger G.A. Souchastie po sovetslomu ugolovnomu pravy. – М.: yur.lit.1959. –S.63.
12 Poznyshev S.V. Osnovnye nachala nauki ugolovnogo. – М.: Moskovski imperatorski universitet, 2012. –S.372.
13 Rahmetov S.М. Borba s organizovannoi prestupnostyu v sfere pravosudiya. /Borba s organizovannoi. – Аlmaty: Baspa,
1996. –S. 242.
2 Telnov P.F. Otvetstvennost za souchastie v prestuplenii. – М.: yuridicheskaya literatura, 1974. –S.113-145.
3 aliakbarov R.R. Kvalifikatsiya gruppovuh prestuplenii. – М.: yuridicheskaya literatura 1980. –S.6.
4 rhivnue materialy Verhovnogo Suda Respubliki Kazakstan. № 2 к 18/2-96.
5 Kurs sovetskogo ugolovnogo prava. / Pod red. А.А. Piontkovskogo. Тom 2. – М.: Gosyurizdat, 1970. –S. 470-471.
6 Burchak F.G. Uchenie o souchasti po sovetskomu ugolovnomy pravu. – Kiev, 1969. –S.145-146
7 Sbornik postanavleniy Plenuma Verhovnogo Suda Kazahskoi SSR, Plenuma Verhovnogo Suda Respubliki, normativnyh
postanovlenii Verhovnogo Suda Respubliki Kazakstan. – Almaty: Norma-К, 2005. – S.406.
8 ommentariy k Ugolovnomy kodeksu Respubliki Kazakstan. –Аlmaty,: Jetu Jargy 2000. –S.78
9 Sudebnaya praktika po ugolovnym delam Verhovnogo Suda Respubliki Kazakstan. – Аstana: ZAO «Bi-Logistika», 2003.– S.10-11
10 golovnyi kodeks Rossiskoi Federatsi. –Мoskva: Ekcmo, 2002.
11 rishaevP.I., Kriger G.A. Souchastie po sovetslomu ugolovnomu pravy. – М.: yur.lit.1959. –S.63.
12 Poznyshev S.V. Osnovnye nachala nauki ugolovnogo. – М.: Moskovski imperatorski universitet, 2012. –S.372.
13 Rahmetov S.М. Borba s organizovannoi prestupnostyu v sfere pravosudiya. /Borba s organizovannoi. – Аlmaty: Baspa,
1996. –S. 242.
Downloads
Issue
Section
International relations and foreign policy
