The theory of political realism in the international relationship

Authors

  • N. М. Ospanov
        362 132

Keywords:

Political realism, neorealism, balance of power, national interest,

Abstract

Contemporary international political processes in the world put the scientific community in need for deep study the issues of the war and peace, diplomacy, and relationship between nations. The United Nations based on the theory of liberalism, before and after collapse bipolar system of international showed its incapacity to solve many hot problems of the international community. Antagonistic to liberalism political realism explains political processes in the international relations by desire for power and supremacy of force. The purpose of this paper is to analyze genesis of the political realism school of thought and allocation of basic concepts of the doctrine. This paper coherently examines main ideas of the chief founders of the political realism.

References

1 Jonathan Monten. Thucydides and Modern Realism // International Studies Quarterly. – Vol.50. – No.1 (Mar., 2006). –
P. 3-25.
2 Geoffrey Stern. The structure of international society: An Introduction to the Study of International Relations. – New
York:Pinter, 1995. – 314 p.
3 Political Theories of International Relations: From Thucydides to the Present/ David Boucher. – New York: Oxford University
Press, 1998. – P. 443.
4 Victoria Kahn. Virtue and Example of Agathocles in Machiavelli’s Prince // Representations. – No. 13 (Winter, 1986). –
P.63-83
5 Gregory S. Kavka. Hobbes’s War of All Against All // Ethics. – Vol. 93. – No.2 (Jan., 1983). – Pp. 291-310, P.292-294
6 Russel Kirk. The Roots of American order. Washington. – 1991. – Pp. 540
7 History of Political Philosophy / Edited by Leo Strauss and Joseph Cropsey.- Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1987.
– 966 p.
8 International Relations Theory: Realism, Pluralism, Globalism, and Beyond / Paul R. Viotti, Mark V. Kauppi. – Boston:
Allyn and Bacon, 1999. – 509 p.
9 Essays in honor of E.H. Carr / Edited C.Abramsky. – London, 1974. – 387 p.
10 Ken Booth. Security in Anarchy: Utopian Realism in theory and Practice // International Affairs (Royal Institute of International
Affairs 1944-). – Vol.67. – No. 3, (Jul., 1991). – P. 527-545.
11 Robert G.Gulpin. The Richness of the Tradition of Political Realism // International Organization. – Vol.38. – No.2 (Spring,
1984). – P. 287-304
11 Piki Ish-Shalom. The Triptych of Realism, Elitism, and Conservatism // International Studies Review. – Vol.8. – No.3 (Sep.,2006). – P. 441-468.
12 James E. Dougherty and Robert L. Pfaltzgraff, Jr. Contending Theories of International Relations.- New York, 1996. –
608 p.
13 Explaining and understanding international relations/Martin Hollis and Steve Smith. – Oxford, 1990. – 226 p.
14 Jeffrey W. Taliaferro. Security Seeking under Anarchy: Defensive Realism Revised // International Security. – Vol.25. –
No.3 (Winter, 2000-2001). – P. 128-161
15 International Relations Theory for the twentieth century: an Introduction/ edited by Martin Griffith. – New York, 2007. –
185 p.

Downloads